Everything in public health is evidence-based. When you are making a claim or proposing a solution to a problem, you want to provide the strongest evidence to support your claim or solution. If the foundation--the source of the information--is bad, then your argument will not hold. Once you have found the literature you want to incorporate into your literature review or other project, you'll want to evaluate your resources to make sure they contain information that is factual, reliable, and relevant.
Ask yourself these questions to examine your sources.
AuthorityThe source of the information. |
|
AccuracyThe reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the information. |
|
RelevancyThe importance of the information for your needs. |
|
ObjectivityThe reason the information exists. |
|
CurrencyThe timeliness of the information. |
|
Use this rubric to "grade" your sources. Higher scores are better, but keep in mind that a source does not have to have the highest score to be considered a reputable resource.
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Authority |
Author is listed with credentials that qualify them to speak on the topic; information is reviewed by experts. | Author is listed without credentials; unclear if information is reviewed by experts. | No author is listed, or author is not qualified or credentialed in the field. |
Accuracy |
Claims are supported by evidence; resources are cited; source is organized. | Some claims are not cited; some links are broken. | No evidence is given to support claims; resources not cited; information is not verifiable. |
Relevancy |
Content is related to your topic; information is written for the correct audience and at the correct level. | Content is either related but not at the correct level, or at the correct level but unrelated. | Content is unrelated to your topic; level is too simple; level is too advanced. |
Objectivity |
Information is factual, objective and impartial; source is published and supported by a reputable institution or organization; information is free of bias. | Information may show evidence of subjectivity or partiality; source is supported by an institution but there is evidence of bias; unclear if author is connected to a reputable institution or organization. | Information is not factual, objective, or impartial; unclear what institution or organization published and supports the source; bias is evident. |
Currency |
Publication date included; information is current and/or regularly updated. | Information may be out of date; unclear when last updated. | Unclear publication date; no date of last update. |